Lawyers doing first-pass reading
Discovery bundles, leases, supply agreements and disclosure documents all need a first read for the same clauses and dates. It is necessary work, but it does not need a lawyer's judgement until the second read.
AI for law firms, Australia
We build AI systems for small Australian law firms: research, document review, matter intake and time capture. Published pricing, honest timelines, and a lawyer checking every output before it is relied on.
The short answer
AI is good at the high-volume, low-judgement work around a matter: a first read of documents against your playbook, research summaries with cited sources, intake and engagement letter drafts, and time entries drafted from your emails and calendar. It is not a replacement for a lawyer's advice, and a lawyer reviews every output.
The risk is spending money on the wrong one. A Discovery Sprint (AUD $5K-$15K, 1-2 weeks) finds the single workflow with the best payback in your firm, and tells you honestly if none is worth building.
Where the hours go
Discovery bundles, leases, supply agreements and disclosure documents all need a first read for the same clauses and dates. It is necessary work, but it does not need a lawyer's judgement until the second read.
Intake forms, ID checks, engagement letters and opening the file in your practice management system. The matter stalls here before any legal work begins.
A ten-minute call, a quick email thread, a file review between meetings. If it is not captured the same day it is usually not captured at all, and the firm has done the work for free.
What we build
Every build is scoped to your firm and starts from one of these. Which one comes first depends on your matter volume and your existing tools, which is what the Discovery Sprint works out.
A system that searches the sources you already pay for, then produces a structured research brief in your firm's template. Every point cites its source so a lawyer can check it. Where the sources run out, it says so instead of guessing.
AI reads contracts and bundles, flags clauses that deviate from your standard positions, and pulls out dates and obligations into your file. A lawyer reviews the flags before anything is relied on.
AI collects the intake details, drafts the engagement letter from your templates and pre-fills the matter record. It is staged for partner sign-off, so nobody starts from a blank page.
With consent, AI drafts time entries from the emails, calls and calendar events of the day and matches them to a matter. The fee earner approves, edits or rejects each one.
What you would expect us to address
Before anything is built, the Discovery Sprint maps where client matter data would be processed and stored, whether any of it could train a model, and what your privilege, confidentiality and Privacy Act obligations require.
A lawyer stays responsible for every piece of work. The systems draft, flag and summarise. They do not give advice, and they do not send anything to a client on their own.
How it runs
Same published pricing as every Creative Milk engagement. Full detail on the pricing page.
Phase 01
AUD $5K-$15K
1-2 weeks · Stands alone
A process audit of your firm, system design and success metrics for the one workflow worth fixing first. It ends with a go or no-go and a fixed price for the build. The plan is yours, with no obligation to proceed with us.
Phase 02
AUD $30K-$120K
4-6 weeks · Needs Phase 01
The production system, built into the tools your firm already uses, with full IP transfer, team training and 30 days of post-launch support. Price is fixed at the end of Phase 01. If it does not hit the agreed success metrics, we stay involved until it does.
Who this is for
For a deeper look at what is and is not worth building, read AI for law firms: what's actually worth building. Working across accounting, consulting or construction as well? See AI for professional services firms.
Common questions
AI takes on the high-volume, low-judgement work around a matter: first-pass document review against your playbook, research summaries with cited sources, matter intake and engagement letter drafts, and time entries drafted from emails and calendar events. A lawyer reviews every output before it is relied on or sent. Creative Milk starts with a Discovery Sprint to find which of these is worth building first in your firm.
Privilege and confidentiality are settled before anything is built, not after. The Discovery Sprint maps where client matter data would be processed and stored, whether any of it could be used to train a model, and what your privilege, confidentiality and Privacy Act obligations require. Those decisions are agreed with you and written down. If a workflow cannot be built safely, the Sprint says so.
Creative Milk publishes its pricing. A Discovery Sprint is AUD $5K-$15K over 1-2 weeks and ends with a go or no-go decision and a fixed price for the build. Build & Integrate is AUD $30K-$120K over 4-6 weeks, fixed at the end of the Sprint. The Sprint stands alone: the plan is yours and there is no obligation to proceed with Creative Milk.
No. Creative Milk deliberately works with small businesses, which includes solo practitioners, boutique practices and small to mid-size firms. It does not build for enterprise legal departments. The aim is a project that can be scoped, shipped in weeks and handed over, rather than a year-long programme.
The success metrics are set at the end of the Discovery Sprint. If Build & Integrate does not hit them, Creative Milk stays involved until it does. That guarantee is attached to every Build & Integrate engagement.
Tell us. We will say honestly whether it is worth building, and what we would expect a Discovery Sprint to find.